decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
How, exactly, is Apple doing "tying"? | 484 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
cross-market tying is still illegal
Authored by: PJ on Tuesday, May 15 2012 @ 05:01 PM EDT
It's generally a good idea to sync up our
personal ideas with reality, once it's very
clear where real is.

And it was found that this was not illegal
tying, because it wasn't aftermarket. You
buy the product or you don't. It's not like
a printer vendor requiring that from then on
you can only buy ink from them.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

How, exactly, is Apple doing "tying"?
Authored by: Tkilgore on Tuesday, May 15 2012 @ 05:02 PM EDT
You can buy a copy of Apple's operating system.

You can buy a whitebox computer.

The only problem that someone has who would use the two together is, Apple's
operating system will not run on that whitebox computer unless one has done a
bit of jiggery-poker with the software which seems not to be allowed by law.

The question of whether the law by which the jiggery-poker is not allowed is a
good law or not, is a very interesting question, but that question is not
exactly relevant here. The question of whether or not one likes Apple for using
that law to block people is also a separate issue.

Since a car analogy has already been brought in, one might ask whether some
Fords could be made to run on kerosene. But even if some Fords could be made to
run on kerosene after a bit of tweaking, does anyone accuse Ford of
"tying" its products to gasoline?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )