decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Every time he got bored listening to an expert witness he wrote another version of rangeCheck | 484 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Lots of respect
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 15 2012 @ 05:50 PM EDT
Yeah, RangeCheck is utter beginner level stuff. Definitely not worth $billions
like Oracle wants it to be. Take a cheap, underpaid junior programmer or intern
at ~$20/hour ($40k/year) and claim that it takes them a full hour to write
(which is *laughable*) and it's worth maybe $20. Even if you say it was written
by someone at really expensive lawyer rates, what does that get you? Not even
$1000?

So yeah, I have respect for the judge here learning to code. If he's not
already sick of the experts, maybe he should read this?

https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-dyn0429/

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Every time he got bored listening to an expert witness he wrote another version of rangeCheck
Authored by: bugstomper on Tuesday, May 15 2012 @ 05:51 PM EDT
And here everyone thought he was using a computer to take notes as he sat there
behind the bench.

Or maybe it was his version of Rachel King's drinking game - Every time a lawyer
says "Correct, sir?" write another version of rangeCheck in Java.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Does this disqualify him
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 15 2012 @ 05:54 PM EDT
If the Judge admitted writing the copyrighted code a 100 times, does that now
make him liable for infringement as well. Shouldn't he be forced to excuse
himself, or at least give a great opportunity for appeal?

Since the code is so obvious, and functional, and has been generated 100 times
just by one person, and thousands of times by other programmers, then how can
Oracle now own exclusive rights for the code.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

What languages does he code in?
Authored by: Guil Rarey on Tuesday, May 15 2012 @ 06:19 PM EDT
The judge says he has written a fair amount of code, but not in Java, which he
has been learning for / during this trial

A math major graduating in 1967 with a profession not requiring tech savvy --
what languages is he likely to have used?



---
If the only way you can value something is with money, you have no idea what
it's worth. If you try to make money by making money, you won't. You might con
so

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Now I'm -very- impressed
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 15 2012 @ 07:07 PM EDT
I was impressed before, but
Judge: ... I couldn't have told you the first thing about Java before this problem. I have done, and still do, a significant amount of programming in other languages. I've written blocks of code like rangeCheck a hundred times before. I could do it, you could do it.
now I'm -very- impressed.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Prediction - APPEAL!
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 15 2012 @ 09:22 PM EDT
Boies:

The court was biased - the _Judge_ is a programmer

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )