decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Car trouble disqualifies a juror? | 484 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
I think time (and possibly cost) may have been an issue.
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 15 2012 @ 04:14 PM EDT
When I was a juror in the UK, as a way to impress on us not
to be late, it was made clear that the costs of running a
court in the Old Bailey are astronomical. I can't remember
the figure, but it was something silly like £100,000 per
hour - $160,000 US.

The actual figure may not be accurate but having a court
buliding
full of highly paid lawyers, judges, SVPs, expert witnesses,
reporters and clerks wait around whilst a Marshal is found,
instructed, makes his/her way through the traffic, finds the
(possibly uncooperative) juror - if they are even at home to
be found, and then comes back through the traffic would be
considerable.

Also, there was apparently some communication with the
juror, who decided to take the car back home. Perhaps the
communication indicated that they were not being as helpful
to the court as they might be. Alternatively perhaps counsel
and the judge were impatient.

If there's any more transcript info we may get to know more.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Car trouble disqualifies a juror?
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 15 2012 @ 11:07 PM EDT
It might have been a two hour trip each way.

I can't believe the juror did this on purpose, unless she
wanted to catch today's episode of the View and thought the
judge would postphone things till tomorrow.

If she were to do this it would be early in the trial. To do
so now is kind of like coitus interuptus.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Car trouble - This issue is unresolvable because it is incompatible with an auto analogy. ...nt
Authored by: Ian Al on Wednesday, May 16 2012 @ 04:02 AM EDT
.

---
Regards
Ian Al
Software Patents: It's the disclosed functions in the patent, stupid!

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Car trouble disqualifies a juror?
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 16 2012 @ 11:38 AM EDT
Was it a Ford? (See note below) IIRC, They use M$ in their
auto computers.


Ford: F(ound) o(n) r(oad) d(ead). :)



[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )