decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
but what about install time? | 439 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Great find!
Authored by: jbb on Monday, May 14 2012 @ 03:41 PM EDT
TL;DR:
- Compile time == static binding
- Run time == dynamic binding

---
Our job is to remind ourselves that there are more contexts
than the one we’re in now — the one that we think is reality.
-- Alan Kay

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Thank you for finding this. n/t
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 15 2012 @ 03:07 AM EDT
n/t

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

but what about install time?
Authored by: lwoggardner on Tuesday, May 15 2012 @ 04:02 AM EDT
but what we're talking about here is a 3rd step (install) between compile time and run time.

compile time = once per version of an application
install time = (roughly) once per device
run time = every time the application is launched

Everything done in a previous step is considered static in the context of the current step, while everything we are currently doing is dynamic - ie changing something, otherwise we wouldn't be doing it!

Instead of arguing over the semantics of whether install time is static vs dynamic, would it not be possible to focus on the fact that there are 3 steps here whereas by only talking about static vs dynamic the patent implies only 2 steps, ergo dalvik doesn't practice the claims?

Probably too late for that now. In any case can a technically ignorant jury, reasonable as they are, really be expected to identify truth from the duelling experts scenario, any more frequently than tossing a coin would?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )