|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 14 2012 @ 04:12 PM EDT |
As-in:
"dynamic" is one set, and "run time" is another set, and
they overlap but are not identical. Like the Venn diagram at
the top of that wikipedia article.
Bear with me - maths isn't my field, but that seems to make
the most "sense" - in as much as it parses into something
somewhat meaningful.
I think he's just throwing around jargon to try to make it
sound like he has a point - when he's actually just saying
"They're different", but possibly in a way to court a good
response from the judge who - as I understand it - is a
mathematician of no little ability.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 14 2012 @ 04:38 PM EDT |
Google experts have been running circles around their team, so it's time for
smoke & mirrors.
The jury and the judge don't know what he is talking about, so then maybe they
will feel that he knows what he is talking about, even if they don't know that
he does not know.
I remember this trick in grade school, when you didn't know what the other was
talking about, you were left out of the conversation and you felt "left
out". You maybe said, yea, I know that too (and lied thru your teeth just
to be on the inside, and not as one who "did not know what was being talked
about". It's the cabagge patch mentality, peer pressure, the toy industry
depends on it (where being in means having what everyone else has, and knowing
all about it).
It's a fancy trick... and intention on the part of Jacobs, or else he is really
loosing it and throwing everything but the kitchen sink at Google (and Google
might duck anyway as that might be next)?
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
