decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
GitLaw: GitHub for Laws and Legal Documents - a Tourniquet for American Liberty | 134 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Exclusive: Yahoo’s Thompson Out; Levinsohn In; Board Settlement With Loeb Nears Completion
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, May 13 2012 @ 05:12 PM EDT
Yahoo is sure living up to the original definition of "yahoo".

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

GitLaw: GitHub for Laws and Legal Documents - a Tourniquet for American Liberty
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, May 13 2012 @ 11:11 PM EDT
http://blog.abevoelker.com/gitlaw-github-for-laws-and-legal-documents-a-tourniqu et-for-american-liberty/

---

Hacker News comments are worth the click

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Top judge: ditching software patents a "bad solution"
Authored by: jbb on Monday, May 14 2012 @ 01:28 AM EDT
link

Judge Michel defended his position by saying:

Certainly there are software patents out there that are no good, and that's a shame. We've gotta clean those out. But I'm against these kinds of broad, polemical ways of proceeding.
The obvious problem is that neither the USPTO or the courts are qualified to do the weeding out. The patents in-suit are a perfect example. They are both painfully obvious applications of general techniques that had been known decades before the patents were applied for. Yet unless the examiners in the USPTO and the judges and the lawyers and the juries are practicing in the field, they don't have the knowledge needed to make this simple evaluation.

How on earth are you going to weed out the bad software patents when no one who is doing the weeding can tell the difference between a bad software patent and a "good" one? The only recourse we have is to these ultra-expensive trials which are not only extremely inefficient but are also return extremely uncertain results. None of the people involved (besides some of the witnesses) have the slightest idea of what they are talking about and have no clue about the history or even the process of software development.

The software industry is being strangled to death by the bureaucratic nightmare this man helped to construct and his only response to complaints is the equivalent of:

Let them eat cake!

---
Our job is to remind ourselves that there are more contexts
than the one we’re in now — the one that we think is reality.
-- Alan Kay

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )