|
|
|
| Authored by: hardmath on Sunday, May 13 2012 @ 11:01 AM EDT |
My recollection is your recollection!
--hm
---
"Prolog is an efficient programming language because it is a very stupid theorem
prover." -- Richard O'Keefe[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 14 2012 @ 03:40 AM EDT |
Google will call for a mistrial and then go back and cover
the bases it thinks it missed the first time around, and
will get the next jury to FULLY agree that this case from
Oracle is bogus (on the copyrights, and on the patents).
Oracle thought their "Perry Mason" evidence would have been
those emails, but the guy they had the emails from, was not
a player in the decision side at all and those emails were
about something other than the specifics that Oracle needed
for evidence. Seems that Oracle's law firm didn't
understand the tech (or APIs, etc) that much, and were
guessing based on what some Oracle expert said (that was
wrong).
Hmmm, in another trial, maybe Oracle thinks it can hire
another, more convincing expert that can sell a snow job to
the jury better than their currently selected expert(s)?
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
