decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Oracle's arguments fail if Judge rules APIs not copyrightable | 197 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Oracle's arguments fail if Judge rules APIs not copyrightable
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 14 2012 @ 03:45 AM EDT
The entire US software industry is set back 40 to 50 years, to a time before common cross-vendor APIs existed. FTFY - Us Europeans will be just fine thanks ;)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Oracle's arguments fail if Judge rules APIs not copyrightable
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 14 2012 @ 10:23 AM EDT
The entire software industry is set back 40 to 50 years, to a time before common cross-vendor APIs existed.
Anyone with any basic knowledge of APIs should know that is not true! The huge problem with that is exactly what is can be copyrighted as all APIs are at least derived from Simula and usage of software libraries in other languages:Simula classes could be included in library files and added at compile time. Given the state of copyright laws at the time (i.e., copyright protection was 'not automatic' as it is now), it will be a rather difficult for Oracle or other companies to prove API ownership as all APIs are derivatives of the first API and actually derivative of the first function. That makes SSO rather specific and many of Java APIs are copies of APIs found in other languages.

Don't forget that Oracle only registered the copyrights as a whole, not individual files (assuming that these are found valid by the courts). That really limits what Oracle can do especially as it never showed proof of exclusive individual ownership. Also Oracle has not shown that these APIs are the core of the collective work - the idea of core goes against the idea of a computer language, software libraries and APIs.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

But....
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 14 2012 @ 01:42 PM EDT
Just think of all the billable hours!

As one of Gene Quinn's buddies said "IP generates $40B for the
industry!" This MUST be a good thing, right?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )