|
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, May 13 2012 @ 11:47 AM EDT |
This is probably technically good lawyering when
viewed from a certain angle that is devoid of moral
perspective.
I guess the chance of a meaningful win has to be better
than effectively nothing from statutory damages, even if
the chance looks small.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: The Cornishman on Sunday, May 13 2012 @ 04:52 PM EDT |
You seem to imply that a jury award of comparatively tiny damages would, in and
of itself, be grounds for appeal, but "Waah! we want more than that!"
just doesn't cut it. To appeal there has to be some deficiency in the current
trial that an appeal court would either overturn or remand for retrial. I don't
doubt that both parties could, at this point, come up with half-decent grounds
for appeal, though.
---
(c) assigned to PJ
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|