decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
The small fry are moving abroad. | 400 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
The end is nigh! ... or at least there's trouble ahead
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, May 12 2012 @ 09:04 AM EDT
OK, let's take that as a given then. Given that it's the case that these
defensive and offensive business strategies are genuine and effective, then it
implies that business strategy is overruling the needs and expressed worries of
software engineers in those megacorps.

I don't believe that those people would be silent, from personal experience. I
wasn't silent myself on the two occasions when I worked for a megacorp.
Admittedly I was freelance, and contractors are happier to rock the boat than
permanent staff, but I also witnessed no shortage of permanent staff who
routinely gave top management something to think about by shooting sacred cows
internally. (The subject wasn't patents, but that experience still applies ---
many software experts will be telling their megacorp CEOs that software patents
are a disaster to the future of software engineering, ie. to their own future.)

The conclusion seems to be that the CEOs or the board members who establish
business policy are dismissing those expressions of concerns because they are
less important than the benefits of deploying patent weaponry. Well perhaps,
but that can't go on forever without the best people leaving in disgust at their
management, and it can't continue too long before the greener pastures for
software developers outside the US start to matter.

The "boiling frog slowly" story may be apocryphal rather than
accurate, but it may apply in this case anyway. The US software industry is
going down, because the big patent cannons that the megacorps are firing are
also damaging their own foundations.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

The small fry are moving abroad.
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, May 12 2012 @ 05:56 PM EDT
It's now perfectly standard for any small software shop to move abroad before
they do anything else. There are entire businesses catering to assisting US
programmers in offshoring their operations.

The patent nonsense is quite literally killing the US software industry. Should
be interesting to find out when Google decides to move abroad.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )