decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
The Global Problem | 400 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
The Global Problem
Authored by: sproggit on Sunday, May 13 2012 @ 01:57 AM EDT
In July last year, the US Government's Immigration & Customs Enforcement Agency (ICE) decided that it has jurisdiction over any internet domain with a TLD (Top Level Domain Name) of .com or .net, as reported here. As a result of that unilateral (domestic US) decision, the oversight of ICE became global and had the power to over-rule any nation on earth.

After 9/11, the US Government was able to enact a broad range of policies underpinned by the 'war on terror'. One of the things that the US Government achieved was unfettere d oversight of the SWIFT network. SWIFT, the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications, is based in Belgium. Yet SWIFT's European base (and strict data privacy laws) did not stop the US Treasury from gaining that access. This might seem harmless, but consider the value of this data as "commercial intelligence". Whether or not the data is being used in that way, it would allow the US Government to watch financial transactions between companies the world over.

In 2007, when Microsoft was facing the very real possibility that governments across the world might decide to insist upon software complying with internationally recognised data formats, they embarked upon a massive campaign to have their "Office Open XML" (OOXML) standard accepted by ECMA. Many nations voted "No", in part to the more than 3,000 identified defects in the standard. What happened? Why Microsoft engaged the assistance of the US State Department to "intervene".

The examples go on and on.

The point is a simple one. As an economic force (and a military one, for that matter) the US is so powerful that it can leverage that strength to dictate terms to other nations. The OOXML example is useful because it shows the lengths to which Corporate America works hand-in-glove with the US Government to implement policy. If Microsoft can bring about this amount of influence alone, what would the entire pro-software-patent lobby be able to achieve?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )