|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, May 13 2012 @ 01:26 AM EDT |
This is what happens when the Letter of the law is upheld rather than the spirit
of the law.
It's too bad the Democratic-Republican party (yes singular) beat out the
Federalists or else the Federalist "spirit of the law" ideas may at
least have persisted among the rational thinking beings, not the literally
programmed people.
If the term "dynamic" vs "static" in this context is not
clear to an individual ordinarily skilled in the art as to the exact meaning,
then the claim is invalid. It is a requirement that the patent must be clear to
such people. This is meant to limit over-broad applications of the monopolies
we've granted.
Oracle is abusing the monopoly we've granted them over this idea. I say we
should revoke their right of monopoly here, since it's not conducive to the
betterment of society or the advancement of the arts and science.
We the People gave you "rights holders" the rights by giving up our
own freedoms, now its time to take back our freedom to do what we want with our
machines and data; The agreement we entered into has been breached.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
