decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Day 15 at the Oracle v. Google Trial ~pj - McFadden, Parr, August | 400 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Day 15 at the Oracle v. Google Trial ~pj - McFadden, Parr, August
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, May 12 2012 @ 12:55 AM EDT
> ...they'd drop their case/claims as quickly as they could!

That's right! And obviously they know that.

I think that there is more to this trial than meets the eye. I think it's because Oracle have been upset that they have not been able to make much money from Google since they're smart enough to work around and or develop their own solutions. Google uses some Oracle technology and Google is a very much NIH kind of company so when they can, they dump third party software for their own solutions or less expensive ones.

In my past dealings with Oracle, they have been fast, loose and arrogant. Not the kind of company that makes me feel I can depend on and the kind of company that would squeeze a deal by going around the decision makers.

So, this smells to me like Page calling Ellison's bluff. Ellison didn't see just how much egg he was going to get all over Oracle. Seriously, who would ever want to deal with a company like Oracle now when they must have spent at least north of$20mil each on this case. It's seems like a childish tit for tat game. I think Page actually made a generous offer to settle compared to the crumbs that Oracle is likely to never see because the appeal process will probably cost Oracle far more than they will ever get on appeal.

So there you are, Sun knew that had no case (according to JS). They played nice and Java became relevant again. But Oracle decided to kill the golden goose because no sane executive will ever want to deal with Oracle ever again.

Sad/

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Shame on you
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, May 12 2012 @ 07:12 PM EDT
Shame on you if you have a software patent. Such patents are prohibited, it is
a shame if you commited fraud on the patent office to get it.

If I want to get paid this week, I have to work this week. It is immoral for
specialized industries to get monopolies and be paid over and over again for
work they did once. Patents and copyrights are fundamentally immoral and they
serve no useful purpose.

Shame on you for stealing from society.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )