decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Spring is to J2EE as Dalvik is to J2SE | 162 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Spring is to J2EE as Dalvik is to J2SE
Authored by: lwoggardner on Friday, May 11 2012 @ 09:41 AM EDT
When Oracle say
So Spring uses the Java programming language, but it doesn’t use the Sun-created APIs.
The only way this makes any kind of sense is if the Sun-created APIs they are talking about here are the J2EE APIs, not the J2SE APIs.

The Spring example is supposed to be an analogy, not a direct example of someone re-implementing the functionality of the J2SE, and is has nothing to do with using J2SE. I don't think LE or Oracle's lawyers actually understand this and I can imagine some very frustrated tech folks at Oracle trying to explain it - "not that Java, this Java"

It doesn't even make sense for them to be deliberately obtuse because I can't see how the Judge could possibly get it either.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )