|
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, May 11 2012 @ 05:37 AM EDT |
Wait, so Oracle's saying that Google should have taken the core API, like Spring
does, then build a bunch of incompatible API stuff on top of it to do things
their own way?
THAT'S WHAT GOOGLE DID.
In the Android API, you have Intents, and Actions, and a host of other API
that's specific to android. It's not 100% just the 37 core packages -- You get
access to the 50 some odd core API packages, but you also get the Android
stuff.
Just like with Spring, where you get the core Java API (essential language
features), and Spring's alternative to Java's Enterprise Edition API.
So... What's the problem? The problem is that Oracle doesn't like Google, and
thought they could get extort some license fees, even though, Google tried their
hardest to play by the book.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|