|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, May 10 2012 @ 03:10 PM EDT |
But with respect to Google being found to have indirectly infringed, the direct
infringement does not need to have been done by them. In fact, the judge's jury
instructions says that the have to decide whether others (handset makers,
developers, etc.) directly infringed before deciding if Google indirectly
infringed, but there is no place on the special verdict form for the direct
infringement by others to be found or not found, and the section of the special
verdict form that deals with indirect infringement refers to the section where
they were to have decide whether Google directly infringed.
Please go back and read the jury instructions concerning indirect infringement,
and then read the last 2 questions on the special verdict form, and see for
yourself.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|