|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 09 2012 @ 06:09 PM EDT |
Jacobs is either stupid or acting stupid... Officer of the
court? Ha! INAL either.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 09 2012 @ 06:28 PM EDT |
redefine the word and hope your definition sticks.
It's not an API it's a Spec
it's not a Spec, it's all our code
which documents itself in the spec
which has all the names in the SSO
the SSO that's in the code
it's not the code it's the names
the SSO of the names
which is the names[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 09 2012 @ 08:36 PM EDT |
The reason why this game continues is because lawyers don't get their knuckles
rapped for abusing the terminology of the domain that they are representing.
They are lawyers, not domain experts in any domain except law. It should not be
permissible for them to modify or distort domain terminology or domain
understanding as a creative game towards their legal ends.
Unfortunately that's not going to change. Lawyers, judges and politicians (and
priests in some parts of the world) all believe that their competence and domain
jurisdiction has no limits. That's a large contributor to the world being in
the mess it's in.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, May 10 2012 @ 06:03 AM EDT |
I should note that it is possible for an emulator to simulate some other program
doing parsing. The two operations are entirely distinguishable, however.
Inasmuch as lawyers would heckle someone for using the wrong legal term, even
pairs of words close in meaning, these two terms are simply too far apart to be
confusing to anyone who understands their meaning. Or in legal terms, it's
about like confusing jurisdiction with standing and not at all like confusing
guilty with liable.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
