Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 09 2012 @ 03:47 PM EDT |
>Chord progressions can not be copyrighted.
Interesting theory. One that isnot supported by either UK or US case law.
Prime example is the copyright infrngement lawsuits the Beatles lost in both
countries.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- 100% correct - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 09 2012 @ 08:07 PM EDT
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 09 2012 @ 04:11 PM EDT |
I would even say that the API is the titles - those are just the names. Rather
I'd say it is but those characteristics (all the things you need to do to write
one) of musical works that make a sonata, a fugue, a symphony, and a rock song
all distinguishable from each other.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, May 10 2012 @ 04:47 AM EDT |
So, could "da da da dum" be copyrighted? [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|