|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 09 2012 @ 10:32 AM EDT |
The main point that Oracle is trying to show by using the "Hello
World" speed test is that they are claiming that "removing the
patented technology from Android" causes it to run slower.
Google's main defense is that ANDROID DOES NOT PRACTICE THE PATENTED TECHNOLOGY
in the first place, so how could Oracle have removed it?
This is not evidence of infringement. It is evidence that removing something
from Android makes it slower. So what? Is that something that they removed the
incarnation of the patented technology? They haven't proven that yet.
I would think that Google should have filed a motion that this evidence be
stricken from the patent liability phase and could only be used in the damages
phase if Oracle proved infringement in the patent liability phase.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 09 2012 @ 11:55 AM EDT |
..they chose to for compatibility with Java programmer head space.
And as you rightly point out, Android and Java are not the same thing.
I'd like to see a definition of "removed" to know what was actually
done to demonstrate that removal of the patented technology produces a ~10% slow
down.
Otherwise HelloWorld is merely a frivolous test with no boundaries for sensible
comparison.
if it was done on an Android emulator, you've basically just introduced another
layer of interference that will likely have at least a +/-10% slow down for any
operation
If it was done on an Android device, how is it that Oracle are complaining that
Android is not compatible?
If it was Java on a PC, and android on a Device
well that's not exactly measuring the same thing.
Were all other system services shutdown so as not to interfere with the test?
What does 10% mean? If load time is 50ms, then a 10% difference maybe no more
than margin of error in reliable tick count.
Did the "removal" accidentally cripple something else and cause an
'indirect' slow down?
Before suggesting people are "ridiculing things they don't
understand", you should consider that there are many here do have a very
good understanding and that your own view is likely limited and blinkered.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|