decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Innovating? | 360 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Oracle used to oppose software patents...
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 09 2012 @ 09:00 AM EDT
This is a very perceptive observation. Innovators don't want to be blindsided by
obvious patents. Patent trolls (like Oracle now) are parasites trying to suck
money out of the innovators.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Oracle used to oppose software patents...
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 09 2012 @ 09:15 AM EDT
I am not sure that "stopping innovating" is the key factor
on when patents become important in a company.

My view is that it is behavioral and atmospheric. A
smaller company with great ideas is idealistic and wants to
make cool things work. Their mission is one of idealism
and dreaming - they have an idea which might change the
world. Even more than "do no harm" - it's more of a "let's
do something original and fun and cool".

Eventually, if the company is successful, the company grows.
And the 'suits' (i.e. lawyers, deal makers, business
development consultants) suck the breath out of the creative
atmosphere and start trying to mold a 'business' out of a
dream.

Once that happens, the whole mission of the company changes,
from an intellectually satisfying pursuit to a chase for
dollars. And ideas get quantified and patented and the job
is no longer creative.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Innovating?
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 09 2012 @ 10:19 AM EDT
What does "Innovating" mean?

It's a buzzword that has crept into our language, which, as best as I can tell,
means: "Taking other peoples inventions and doing things with them, without
actually inventing anything yourself."

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

  • Innovating? - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 09 2012 @ 10:34 AM EDT
    • Innovating? - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 09 2012 @ 10:29 PM EDT
Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )