decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
I've just read patent '104 and I feel sick | 360 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
I've just read patent '104 and I feel sick
Authored by: Yossarian on Wednesday, May 09 2012 @ 02:15 AM EDT
I have to agree with this one.
My first reaction when I read: "A 'symbolic reference' tags data with a
name rather than its numeric memory location"
was "Gee, did not I do just that in Symbolic Lisp machine 30 years
ago"?!

A quick check in Wikipedia shows other people thought that in the Common Lisp
discussion. E.g. "In the first
way, a macro expansion can inadvertently make a symbolic
reference which the macro writer assumed will resolve in
a global namespace,"

How could the patent office let *that* stand?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

And as for the 520 Patent
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 09 2012 @ 04:01 AM EDT
ISTR that this was pretty much the technique that ULTRAHLE used for Nintendo 64
emulation in 1999.

As you were trying to emulate an N64 on a PC the software got away from the
usual 'emulate every instruction for the processor' type as found in MAME.
ULTRAHLE loaded the rom image then scanned it to find common code sequences that
could be replaced by High Level Emulation (HLE) equivalents.

i.e. It emulated the N64 in a virtual machine but scanned the program/rom to use
simulated functions where possible for speed.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UltraHLE

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

I've just read patent '104 and I feel sick
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 09 2012 @ 04:03 AM EDT
I've just noticed PJ's PDF link in Update 2 which appears to declare patent '104 as invalid.

Interestingly, I have David Gries' original 1971 book 'Compiler Construction for Digital Computers' (which is the basis of the rejection) on my bookshelf. Unfortunately I read it so long ago that the details are really fuzzy now, but it did contribute to my overall CompSci education at the time. :-)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

I've just read patent '104 and I feel sick
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 09 2012 @ 10:55 AM EDT
That description sounds very much like what Grace Hopper described as the
"give and go" technique she developed for an early COBOL compiler to
hold onto a symbol until it could be assigned a storage location. She explained
that she modeled it from the basketball play.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )