Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 07 2012 @ 01:36 PM EDT |
n/t [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 07 2012 @ 03:08 PM EDT |
Referring to the 2nd "Update 4", of course. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 07 2012 @ 03:24 PM EDT |
n/t [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 07 2012 @ 03:36 PM EDT |
So that it's after Update 4 in the article. That way people can find it. I agree
that it's probably the most important thing to come out of today's partial
verdict, but I wouldn't have found it other than by stumbling across it as I had
read the top part of the story earlier and had been refreshing my browser and
looking at the bottom for updates. I only noticed Update 5 near the top because
I accidentally closed my browser and went back into the story at the top and saw
it.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: attila_the_pun on Monday, May 07 2012 @ 04:04 PM EDT |
Just a sliver of text [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 07 2012 @ 04:31 PM EDT |
Evidence of infringement: Google programmers stated in Android that Android
resolves "Symbolic references":
/* Link ( prepare and resolve ) Verification is deferred until later
* this converst symbolic references into pointers
Tufty
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: kds on Monday, May 07 2012 @ 04:54 PM EDT |
Change the title from "Updated 4Xs" to "Updated 7Xs". [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 07 2012 @ 05:15 PM EDT |
see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Safra_A._Catz
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 07 2012 @ 06:03 PM EDT |
Sorry PJ but you can't get a "steady flow of FUD" from the right
people. That would be oxymoronicle.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: nsomos on Monday, May 07 2012 @ 06:36 PM EDT |
In about the fifth last sentence of recap of the day ...
"And that doesn't even count the hugh stream of misinformation from"
hugh -> huge[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: moz1959 on Monday, May 07 2012 @ 07:43 PM EDT |
Based on 9 lines of copying out of 15 million? That would ge a big, big
stretch.
s/ge/be
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 07 2012 @ 07:53 PM EDT |
n/t [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 07 2012 @ 08:14 PM EDT |
And that doesn't even count the hugh stream of misinformation
from
"huge" perhaps?
don't think Oracle is a "hugging" mood right
now.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 07 2012 @ 08:45 PM EDT |
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 08 2012 @ 07:56 AM EDT |
Unless of course it's to be read as "six billion dollar dollar case" -
we know how Oracle loves $$ :)[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 08 2012 @ 09:05 AM EDT |
I noticed this mistake at the top of two of the transcripts. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 08 2012 @ 12:38 PM EDT |
It means all Sun won that matters is regarding the APIs, which the judge,
unfortunately told the jury to assume were copyrightable....
Should be Oracle, not Sun, I believe
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 08 2012 @ 01:12 PM EDT |
Tufty
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 08 2012 @ 11:15 PM EDT |
after further reading, all references to "Berger" should
actually be Birger. Seeon Birger is the Oracle engineer
mentioned in various filings as involved with the performance
testing of Android (see docket 493)[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 09 2012 @ 04:02 PM EDT |
I have suffered from a Groklaw addiction in the past, but nowadays I only
occasionally read an article. As a result it took me quite some time to figure
out what SSO means: structure, sequence and organisation. When I found it I
remembered reading it before. But if you don't know it's not easy to find. It is
not a common meaning of the acronym. It's not on Wikipedia or in dictionaries.
It doesn't turn up in most searches (the Groklaw search on the term only returns
completeley empty pages).
It would be useful to spell it out the first time it is used in an article.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|