|
Authored by: pem on Monday, May 07 2012 @ 05:16 PM EDT |
He can rule "no reasonable juror can find x."
I would like to believe that if he takes it upon himself to rule this way, it
will favor google. Personally, I think a reasonable juror could easily have
found for fair use, and only Oracle's masterful misdirection would allow any
other finding.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 08 2012 @ 08:18 AM EDT |
plaintiff dissembled(lied) in pre-trial about the nature of the work and need
for abstraction/filtration.
Everything since that revalation has been a busted attempt to rescue the show
from being a complete waste of every ones times.
I fail to understand how they have not dismissed the Jury.
They already know they have one juror who is a) biased (her husband has patents)
and b) is incapable of obeying court instructions (she is using her husband to
decide for her)
Add in the dissembling and this is frankly no more than a farce now.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|