|
|
|
| Authored by: feldegast on Monday, May 07 2012 @ 11:24 AM EDT |
From previous article
---------
Ginny LaRoe @GinnyLaRoe
This is a pretty heated fight over two witnesses: lindholm
and schwartz. Van Nest irritates Alsup by not having wit
around to probe this AM
Rachel King @ZDNetRachel
Done & done: Alsup rules that Lindholm will testify in
patent phase to determine "willfulness" #OraclevGoogle
----------------
Caleb Garling @CalebGarling
Alsup not making a final ruling on @openjonathan testifying
Ginny LaRoe @GinnyLaRoe
Oracle gets to again put on its fav geek, tim lindholm. But
Alsup says heck no to that famous email. #Googacle
---
IANAL
My posts are ©2004-2012 and released under the Creative Commons License
Attribution-Noncommercial 2.0
P.J. has permission for commercial use.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 07 2012 @ 11:43 AM EDT |
From wired article... in this tweet
Caleb Garling ‏ @CalebGarling
In Oracle v Google, Judge Holds Fate of Java APIs http://bit.ly/KHGJsH
"Ronald Abramson, a lawyer with with the international firm Hughes,
Hubbard, and Reed, believes Alsup is unlikely to rule that APIs can be
copyrighted. “I’d be surprised, at the end of the day, if that copyright
survives. Functionality has always been the boundary point,” he says, referring
to the way an API functions, as opposed to the code used to build it. "
Whatever is Florian going to do?[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
