|
| Authored by: kuroshima on Monday, May 07 2012 @ 11:57 AM EDT |
From @CalebGarling
"This
spoonfeeding of experts is a bad trend. I
don't like it. And both of you have
done it." - Alsup.
(Concur) (Source)
Excuse me if this seems obvious, but I'm not a native
English speaker, what does this mean? [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 07 2012 @ 12:03 PM EDT |
Rachel King Rachel King @ZDNetRachel
Judge: We are here
to discover whether or not there are grounds to sue.
Aren't
motions around there being sufficient grounds to sue usually heard very early on
by the judge, way before the jury trial actually starts? Like a motion for
summary judgement for failure to state a case. This judge seems to be doing a
lot of things backwards.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: feldegast on Monday, May 07 2012 @ 12:10 PM EDT |
BrandonBailey @BrandonBailey
Earlier: Judge scolded Google 4 letting Schwartz say no
grounds to sue - ambiguous, unresponsive. Wud have tossed but
Oracle didnt object.
---
IANAL
My posts are ©2004-2012 and released under the Creative Commons License
Attribution-Noncommercial 2.0
P.J. has permission for commercial use.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
