|
| Authored by: nsomos on Monday, May 07 2012 @ 11:39 AM EDT |
Please post corrections here.
A summary in the posts title may be helpful.
Thnks -> Thanks[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: feldegast on Monday, May 07 2012 @ 11:42 AM EDT |
Please make links clickable
---
IANAL
My posts are ©2004-2012 and released under the Creative Commons License
Attribution-Noncommercial 2.0
P.J. has permission for commercial use.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
- News picks - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 08 2012 @ 06:01 AM EDT
|
|
| Authored by: feldegast on Monday, May 07 2012 @ 11:43 AM EDT |
| https://twitter.com/#!/Feldegast -
--
IANAL
My posts are ©2004-2012 and released under the Creative Commons License
Attribution-Noncommercial 2.0
P.J. has permission for commercial use. [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: feldegast on Monday, May 07 2012 @ 11:44 AM EDT |
Please make links clickable
---
IANAL
My posts are ©2004-2012 and released under the Creative Commons License
Attribution-Noncommercial 2.0
P.J. has permission for commercial use.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: feldegast on Monday, May 07 2012 @ 11:45 AM EDT |
Thank you for your support
---
IANAL
My posts are ©2004-2012 and released under the Creative Commons License
Attribution-Noncommercial 2.0
P.J. has permission for commercial use.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 07 2012 @ 11:47 AM EDT |
"It only tests Android devices for appropriate output responses; it does
not test for the source code actually used to produce those responses."
Why not let Oracle argue that the test suite is sufficient to test for the
presence of their patented technology?
The implications of that should be easy to present.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: nsomos on Monday, May 07 2012 @ 11:53 AM EDT |
The various 104 patent stipulations that Google is willing to make,
suggests to me that Google either already has coded around this patent,
or can very easily do so at this time. By having Oracle stipulate that
they failed to mark, damages are time bounded by when Google was given
notice.
Perhaps the possible legal bills to fight, outweigh the small technical
burden of avoiding this patent.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 07 2012 @ 12:38 PM EDT |
From his blog yesterday...
"Linus Torvalds, who started the Linux project, is an opportunist who will
welcome anything that gets some of his program code distributed, no matter under
which name or license."
Ha ha.
This is FLORIAN MEULLER calling Linus "an opportunist".
This is high opera. You couldn't make it up. Seriously.
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
- OMG @ Florian - Authored by: 351-4V on Monday, May 07 2012 @ 12:49 PM EDT
- OMG @ Florian - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 07 2012 @ 12:50 PM EDT
- Opera Buffo? - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 07 2012 @ 12:51 PM EDT
- OMG @ Florian - Authored by: kjs on Monday, May 07 2012 @ 12:57 PM EDT
- OMG @ Florian - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 07 2012 @ 01:04 PM EDT
- OMG @ Florian - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 07 2012 @ 01:45 PM EDT
- Hey, it's true, just worded badly :) - Authored by: bugstomper on Monday, May 07 2012 @ 02:29 PM EDT
- OMG @ Florian - Authored by: ThrPilgrim on Monday, May 07 2012 @ 03:26 PM EDT
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 07 2012 @ 07:16 PM EDT |
| (no text) [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 08 2012 @ 11:23 AM EDT |
There are a lot of references to patent '104, '520, etc., does anyone have the
actual complete patent numbers for all the patents involved ? It seems like all
linked documents use the abbreviated form.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
