|
Authored by: Christian on Saturday, May 05 2012 @ 12:55 PM EDT |
From these questions and other questions it sounds like Judge Alsup is trying to
distinguish between two kinds of structure. One is structure for human
convenience, just putting similar routines into bins to keep things organized.
The other structure is functional structure; subclass A.a from class A depends
on subclass B.b of class B. (Sorry if I get the Java nomenclature wrong, but I
do oop in python.)
Perhaps his thought is that there may be a significant underlying functional
structure demonstrated by interconnections between the classes which was not
copied/reused by Google. Or maybe this is to show that almost all classes
depend on string manipulation, so it doesn't make any sense to distinguish
between the string class and the core language. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|