|
Authored by: Ed L. on Saturday, May 05 2012 @ 12:30 AM EDT |
The commenter deleted his comment [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- Oh - Authored by: Gringo_ on Saturday, May 05 2012 @ 12:32 AM EDT
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, May 05 2012 @ 11:58 AM EDT |
Oracle is claiming the right to disclose the privileged information. The
question is "Did Schwartz have the right at the time or not?" You can
not unring a bell. The question before the court is to what degree can Google
persue privileged information that has been partially revealed? If Google
relied on that information then Google is entitled to a fair and complete
statement as to what it meant and only Schwartz can say what he meant. This
does not mean that Google can go on a fishing expedition through privileged
communication. But what has been revealed through the blog may be fair game. I
do not see how the testimony can be thrown out but there must be some
restrictions.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|