decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Even so... | 314 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Even so...
Authored by: BitOBear on Sunday, May 06 2012 @ 04:55 PM EDT
Where did the word "manifest" come from?

If you are -skilled- as a shipping and receiving clerk and you receive a box
full of broken masonry (bricks etc) and the manifest for the box says "high
end televisions, qty 12" you are probably going to raise the alarm.

If you are a -really- skilled shipping clerk and you get a box with a manifest
that says "iPad Touch, qty 10" and find eleven in the box you are
going to raise the alarm as well.

Having expectations of a box and procedures for handling a properly packed box,
and procedures for handling an improperly packed box, do not imbue the box
itself, nor its contents, with the power of self awareness nor polymorphism.

The White House doesn't speak, even if journalists say things like like
"the White House said today...". Common mis-attribution of feature or
action doesn't make the mis-attribution correct for being common.

A jar file is a zip file of a directory tree with an additional file in it
called Manefest and its name changed from whatever.zip to whatever.jar to
indicate that fact. There are rules for what a .jar file must and must not
contain. There are rules for how java will treat a .jar file. None of those
things have anything to do with the code in each or any of the .class files that
might be in the .jar file.

Being a member of a package is like being a member of a club. The world may have
expectations of you because of the name of your club, but you and you alone
adopt or eschew those expectations. The environment may treat members of
"Motorcycle Club" different than members of "Benevolent
Society" but that is a feature of the world not the club. (As much of a
stretch as that may seem to be, its true.)

There -are- languages where "class" and "package" are the
same thing. Perl is such a language. Ada is another kind of. This is a side
effect of the fact that classes are containers and some language designers
didn't want two container thingies because they didn't need separate "boxes
that imbue" -and- "boxes that control access". (e.g. perl doesn't
have "protected" things).

Classes are structures (in C++ the words class and struct are interchangeable at
essentially every level) that do the things that structures do, to be made part
of the class is to become part of the structure. This is like welding I-beams
and trusses together to make a steel floor.

Packages are like boxes. One does not "become part of" the box in a
way that changes the nature of the box, nor is one changed by becoming part of
the box, one is simply placed within the box.

That's why there are two separate words for the thing in Java because the
needed/wanted both kinds of things.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

  • Even so... - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, May 06 2012 @ 06:47 PM EDT
Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )