Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

My bet is that it is #3... with the file names. So, maybe they will guess? | 123 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

My bet is that it is #3... with the file names. So, maybe they will guess?

Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, May 04 2012 @ 05:17 PM EDT

Wondering if FUD/PR campaigning can have an effect on members of
the jury. (Facebook ...) Think it is unlikely that some did not
pick it up somewhere. And suppose they where not very interested
in the subject, would they have questioned what they red or heard?
The reporting about the actions of congress may have supported
that impressing.
Could some negative image of a company as the representation of
evil stayed in the back of some members mind, or has all the
evidence replaced that?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Who is deciding the fate of programming languages? - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, May 04 2012 @ 05:52 PM EDT
- Who is deciding the fate of programming languages? - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, May 04 2012 @ 06:01 PM EDT
  - Who is deciding the fate of programming languages? - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, May 04 2012 @ 08:14 PM EDT
    - Who is deciding the fate of programming languages? - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, May 04 2012 @ 10:08 PM EDT

My bet is that it is #3... with the file names. So, maybe they will guess?

Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, May 04 2012 @ 05:59 PM EDT

It is called the law, get over it.

It is no different than a murder trial. A jury isn't an expert is forensic
analysis but they still decide the outcome.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

My bet is that it is #3... with the file names. So, maybe they will guess? - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, May 04 2012 @ 10:22 PM EDT
- My bet is that it is #3... with the file names. So, maybe they will guess? - Authored by: jonathon on Saturday, May 05 2012 @ 12:46 AM EDT
  - My bet is that it is #3... with the file names. So, maybe they will guess? - Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, May 05 2012 @ 05:27 AM EDT

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )