Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

irrational instruction.. only if ... | 141 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

irrational instruction

Authored by: rcsteiner on Friday, May 04 2012 @ 02:27 PM EDT

Absolutely. This is the main issue I have with what has happened thusfar. IMO,
situations like this are a big reason why the lack of technical knowledge in the
judiciary (after 50 years!) can still cause tremendous harm. :-( Although, to
give this judge credit, he does seem to have caught on to many things quite
quickly. Not quickly enough, tho, I fear...

---
-Rich Steiner >>>---> Mableton, GA USA
The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

irrational instruction.. only if ...

Authored by: webster on Friday, May 04 2012 @ 03:45 PM EDT

.

... he decides that API's are NOT copyrightable. If he decides they are
copyrightable, he is correct so far as the jury is concerned, not necessarily as
far as history, precedent, trade practice, the Court of Appeals, the Supreme
Court, etc. is concerned.

The irrational part is that he did not decide first. Asking to brief Europe's
new decision is also legally irrelevant, albeit interesting and possibly
illuminating.

.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )