|
Authored by: hardmath on Friday, May 04 2012 @ 03:39 PM EDT |
Will the world be shocked to learn that a corporation used a pattern of
corporate decision making under former CEO Schwartz? Was there no smoking trail
of emails produced regarding negotiations with Google?
Perhaps the folks at Oracle, accustom to the firm hand of Ell-is-one, believe it
to be the case.
I don't expect Oracle to succeed in preventing Google from calling Schwartz as a
witness. The sorts of things they are complaining about are dealt with by
objections made about testimony ("nonresponsive, incompetent,
irrelevant") in a timely fashion, which means neither after the fact nor
before the fact.
So Google will probably keep Schwartz on their witness list if for no other
reason than putting opposing counsel off their game.
---
"Prolog is an efficient programming language because it is a very stupid theorem
prover." -- Richard O'Keefe[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|