decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Should APIs be copyrightable? Twitter Poll! Vote now and be heard!! | 141 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Should APIs be copyrightable? Twitter Poll! Vote now and be heard!!
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, May 04 2012 @ 12:54 PM EDT
Make your opinions heard across the social media. Should APIs be copyrightable? PS: I know it now a tweet from the courtroom (and I apologize) but this seemed like a good place to place relevant twitter related activity. In this case, eliciting public opinion and increasing awareness! Please move this to the off-topic thread if you feel it's not appropriate. Thanks.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Tweets from the courtroom
Authored by: feldegast on Friday, May 04 2012 @ 02:11 PM EDT
Dan Levine @FedcourtJunkie
After ominous note yesterday, Oracle vs. Google jury has been
deliberating for 3 hours today with nary a peep.

---
IANAL
My posts are ©2004-2012 and released under the Creative Commons License
Attribution-Noncommercial 2.0
P.J. has permission for commercial use.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

"I'm thinking complete deadlock at this point"
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, May 04 2012 @ 02:30 PM EDT
Rachel King @ZDNetRachel

#OraclevGoogle jury has been deliberating for last 3.5 hours and no word yet.
I'm thinking complete deadlock at this point.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

"A PR for Oracle's law firm, MoFo, was hanging around the press room here"
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, May 04 2012 @ 03:04 PM EDT
James Niccolai @jniccolai

A PR for Oracle's law firm, MoFo, was hanging around the press room here,
without having ID'd herself as PR. She was asked nicely to leave..

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

"Another note from the jury"
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, May 04 2012 @ 03:32 PM EDT
Caleb Garling @CalebGarling

Another note from the jury. I would submit the press can evacuate the pressroom
with the same efficiency as firemen from the station

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

"Breaking: Jury has reached unanimous verdict in all but one question. Jury coming in now"
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, May 04 2012 @ 03:39 PM EDT
Ginny LaRoe @GinnyLaRoe

Breaking: Jury has reached unanimous verdict in all but one question. Jury
coming in now

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

"attys agree they shud hear partial verdict"
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, May 04 2012 @ 03:40 PM EDT
BrandonBailey

jury coming in. attys agree they shud hear partial verdict

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

"short delay: the jury had not yet filled out the form"
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, May 04 2012 @ 03:41 PM EDT
Ginny LaRoe @GinnyLaRoe

short delay: the jury had not yet filled out the form. So we wait. Then we will
hear the verdict. the suspense!

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

"Jury walking in now."
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, May 04 2012 @ 03:46 PM EDT
Ginny LaRoe @GinnyLaRoe

Jury walking in now.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

"Not all in agreement to send that note"
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, May 04 2012 @ 03:47 PM EDT
Caleb Garling @CalebGarling

"Not all in agreement to send that note" jury foreman.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )