decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Oracle v. Google - Jury Still Out; Judge Anticipating Inability of Jury to Decide Some Questions of Fact | 141 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
No
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, May 04 2012 @ 01:27 PM EDT
The jury instructions were clear on that. They were not to communicate to the
judge what any vote counts were, only ask questions. Even if they have come to a
unanimous conclusion, that's all they are supposed to communicate to the judge,
that they had a unanimous conclusion, not what that conclusion was. They are
only supposed to reveal their verdict in court with both parties (or at least
their lawyers) present. Or if they were deadlocked, they weren't allowed to
reveal what the counts were until after they had been discharged.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Oracle v. Google - Jury Still Out; Judge Anticipating Inability of Jury to Decide Some Questions of Fact
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, May 04 2012 @ 01:42 PM EDT
In my experience the Judge only gets the final document at the end of
deliberations. Often the judge will query the jury one by one verbally to
confirm the various counts in court. (Which is nail biting for jurors as
someone could change their mind at the last minute.) The jury and the judge
never speak directly. It's all notes to the judge, and either written or verbal
instructions back. You aren't suppose to talk about the case outside the jury
room. (Even at lunch with fellow jurors.) So I'm pretty sure the Judge doesn't
know where the jury is.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )