Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, May 03 2012 @ 06:47 PM EDT |
http://i.imgur.com/rB86B.png [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: mbouckaert on Thursday, May 03 2012 @ 07:49 PM EDT |
This
one. Read in the
light of the DotCom saga, and of the varied attempts to
legalize Internet freedom out of existence.
--- bck [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, May 03 2012 @ 09:28 PM EDT |
linky [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, May 03 2012 @ 11:11 PM EDT |
According to
Oxford University Computing Services.
Nitpick: I reckon some form of
it was active a year
earlier than they claim, before September 2010.
The beast has evolved by increasing the
sophistication of its drive-by
vector.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: SpaceLifeForm on Friday, May 04 2012 @ 06:04 AM EDT |
Link
For the same reasons discussed here some time ago.
Ruling here
---
You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, May 04 2012 @ 10:26 AM EDT |
Is it bad form to add a thread before the standard threads are finalized?
The mandatory Corrections/News Picks/Off Topic(/Comes Transcribing) should, I
feel, be first and with the speed bump in place, it would seem to be but fair to
allow the lucky first_to_post sufficient time to finish the lap.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- no - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, May 04 2012 @ 10:28 AM EDT
- no..?!? - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, May 04 2012 @ 11:59 AM EDT
- Yes - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, May 04 2012 @ 10:52 AM EDT
- First to post - Authored by: artp on Friday, May 04 2012 @ 12:23 PM EDT
- First to post - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, May 04 2012 @ 02:30 PM EDT
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, May 04 2012 @ 10:33 AM EDT |
Federal authorities who seized a popular hip-hop music site based on
assertions from the Recording Industry Association of America that it was
linking to four “pre-release” music tracks gave it back more than a year later
without filing civil or criminal charges because of apparent recording industry
delays in confirming infringement, according to court records obtained by
Wired.
The Los Angeles federal court records, which were unsealed Wednesday
at the joint request of Wired, the Electronic Frontier Foundation and the First
Amendment Coalition, highlight a secret government process in which a judge
granted the government repeated time extensions to build a civil or criminal
case against Dajaz1.com, one of about 750 domains the government has seized in
the last two years in a program known as Operation in Our Sites.
Apparently,
however, the RIAA and music labels’ evidence against Dajaz1, a music blog, never
came.
David
Kravets, Wired[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Gringo_ on Friday, May 04 2012 @ 01:01 PM EDT |
PCWorld
article By Chloe Albanesius. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|