decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Not a GPL decision | 81 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
The Open Group sue Oracle over UNIX/POSIX copyrights. n/t
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, May 03 2012 @ 12:40 PM EDT
The Open Group sue Oracle over UNIX/POSIX copyrights. n/t

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Not a GPL decision
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, May 03 2012 @ 12:53 PM EDT

Android doesn't use the GPL licence, so the GPL declaration doesn't apply. The GPLv2 even includes interfaces in its language.

The wrong decision here could definitely be reason to panic, but it won't be a GPLv2 problem.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Oracle's end game, might not be Android? MySQL proprietary -it's starting already see article.
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, May 03 2012 @ 12:57 PM EDT
Oracle may "fork itself" with recent MySQL moves
"Oracle's recent release of three new commercial extensions to the MySQL database has caused an outcry among some in the MySQL community. Some, including project founder Michael "Monty" Widenius, are concerned that Oracle, by moving to an "open core" model, will slowly move more and more of the database project to commercially licensed codeā€”and to licensing terms that make it difficult for users to escape".
Ok - got the whole picture now?

Question - This Google case, in the worst case, if Google were to lose... could a loss then be a building block for Oracle to be able to make a lot of IP that was open sourced, to be then controled strictly by Oracle?

So, who is evil?
Of course, Oracle is not, as they could be sued by stockholders IF they didn't follow this path.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )