|
| Authored by: rsteinmetz70112 on Wednesday, May 02 2012 @ 09:36 AM EDT |
This has been a great service, I just don't know what I'll do while the jury
deliberates.
---
Rsteinmetz - IANAL therefore my opinions are illegal.
"I could be wrong now, but I don't think so."
Randy Newman - The Title Theme from Monk
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- Thank you - Authored by: feldegast on Wednesday, May 02 2012 @ 10:21 AM EDT
- Arrrgh - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 02 2012 @ 04:05 PM EDT
- Arrrgh - Authored by: PJ on Wednesday, May 02 2012 @ 04:59 PM EDT
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 02 2012 @ 09:40 AM EDT |
...makes my day go very slowly.
thanks for the retweet-collection.
(what's collective noun for tweeter? twits? tw..?)[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 02 2012 @ 10:21 AM EDT |
@Feldegast Do you have a Google+ account. It would be
convenient to follow your updates from there as well...[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: feldegast on Wednesday, May 02 2012 @ 11:13 AM EDT |
Back at the U.S. District Court while Oracle-Google jury
deliberates. Google's Bruce Baber said good morning to me
today!
---
IANAL
My posts are ©2004-2012 and released under the Creative Commons License
Attribution-Noncommercial 2.0
P.J. has permission for commercial use.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: feldegast on Wednesday, May 02 2012 @ 11:33 AM EDT |
Rachel King @ZDNetRachel
Courtroom unlocked and Oracle's lawyers showed up all of a
sudden. They always look so serious in the hallway!
---
IANAL
My posts are ©2004-2012 and released under the Creative Commons License
Attribution-Noncommercial 2.0
P.J. has permission for commercial use.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 02 2012 @ 11:40 AM EDT |
| http://twitpolls.com/s/RA [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 02 2012 @ 11:57 AM EDT |
According to @CalebGarling's newest tweet:
Alsup in the house. No verdict. We're answering jury
questions. "Can we consider indirect revenue from the
copyrighted work?"
This is not a good sign. First, there is no copyright to
speak of. (apart from the hypothetical misleading argument
in the jury instructions) And second, people with android
are quite FREE to access any search engine they want to.
They are not locked into viewing ANY ads whatsoever.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 02 2012 @ 01:29 PM EDT |
Looks like BS beats common sense again. Van Nest might have out-lawyered
Oracle, but the "Honorable" Judge Alsup can more than equalize good
lawyering.
I'm trying to understand why, if, it's the judge's ultimate call, on whether
APIs can be copyrighted, he sent the question to the jury at all?
Especially since he sent the question to the jury with jury instructions that
were skewed in Oracle's favor even after he knew there was a serious question
about whether the copyrights were even valid.
If (by some miracle) Judge Alsup rules that APIs aren't copyrightable and the
jury rules they are, how does that help this case?[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 02 2012 @ 01:41 PM EDT |
Now where did I put that Big Fat Manual?
Rachel King ‏ @ZDNetRachel
New juror note dropped in by owl/raven: No one ever defined
"specification" in Oracle-Google case. What does it mean?
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: feldegast on Wednesday, May 02 2012 @ 01:42 PM EDT |
BrandonBailey @BrandonBailey
In trial, Google showed video of Ellison praising Android and
Sun running its own software on top of Android.
---
IANAL
My posts are ©2004-2012 and released under the Creative Commons License
Attribution-Noncommercial 2.0
P.J. has permission for commercial use.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 02 2012 @ 02:39 PM EDT |
@ZDNetRachel
Oracle will have DVD player here by 11AM, Google will make sure there is no
funny business. Wi-Fi disabled--forbid they look at our tweets!
Does this sound like a good idea?
Even if we believe that they wouldn't deliberately contaminate the
laptop with material the jury shouldn't see, it seems posible that a laptop
provided by Oracle's legal team might inadvertently contain sensitive stuff (or
have wifi left on - these guys are probably not the world's leading techies...)
If the court provides evidence in DVD form, why does the court not provide
the necessary equipment directly?
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: feldegast on Wednesday, May 02 2012 @ 03:34 PM EDT |
Rachel King @ZDNetRachel
The courthouse stakeout will go to 4PM b/c the jury went to
lunch. Made for some fascinating lawyer sightings at court
cafe
---
IANAL
My posts are ©2004-2012 and released under the Creative Commons License
Attribution-Noncommercial 2.0
P.J. has permission for commercial use.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
