decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
News Corp board comes out in support of Murdoch | 359 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Not here
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 02 2012 @ 06:41 PM EDT
Don't know about US but in UK a major scandal involving regular invasion of
privacy of many individuals of all social standings. The fact that some UK
'business friendly' politicians did not think anything major was wrong is very
worrying. The US disease seems to have spread somewhat.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

News Corp board comes out in support of Murdoch
Authored by: jjs on Wednesday, May 02 2012 @ 07:49 PM EDT
1. Please do not bring politics here.

2. This is a case where News International violated UK law.
The question is how much the Murdocks knew. Both have touted
their hands-on management in the past. Now, all of a sudden,
they were compeletely out of the loop (according to them),
and have had no hands-on management. Which is it? And why,
when they became aware of the problem, did they not dig into
it?

---
(Note IANAL, I don't play one on TV, etc, consult a practicing attorney, etc,
etc)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

News Corp board comes out in support of Murdoch
Authored by: Wol on Wednesday, May 02 2012 @ 08:06 PM EDT
Thing is, News Corp has been the epitome of the Gutter Press in the UK.

Then it comes out that it appears to be corporate pressure from on high that
pushed journalists to engage in things like phone hacking, breaking into
voicemail, etc.

Plus a very cosy relationship between the Met and senior News International
staff where things had a habit of "leaking" - to the extent that
police investigations could be seriously hampered!

And every time more news came out it just got worse. Official cover-ups. The
murder case has already been mentioned where journalists hacked into the
victim's phone, and listened to and deleted messages!

It wouldn't surprise me if it was this hacking that compromised Prince Harry in
Afghanistan. How much other stuff has ended up in the papers as a result of this
invasion of privacy? And the thing is, it has NOT been politicos and their ilk
who've suffered most. It's been innocent bystanders of cataclysmic events who've
just been unlucky enough to be in the wrong place at the wrong time, and ended
up being the subject of intense press scrutiny. Like the family of poor Millie.

Cheers,
Wol

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )