Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

OK, I checked. | 287 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

OK, I checked.

Authored by: s65_sean on Tuesday, May 01 2012 @ 04:41 PM EDT

Sun's 10-K (Annual statement) for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2007, did not
say anything about the CEO's blog. The one that PJ posted was for the following
year. I looked at the 10-Q (quarterly statements) for the first 3 quarters of
the fiscal year ending June 30, 2008, and they do not mention it either. The
first mention of the CEO's blog appears to be in the Annual report for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2008, which is the one that PJ posted about. So it
appears that, if the Scwhartz blog in question was published in 2007 as Schwartz
himself testified, that Oracle's argument might hold water. There was also
discussion in Schwartz's testimony of his attempts to be able to make material
company information available via his blog, and sending a letter to the chairman
of the SEC asking about that. Perhaps they didn't get approval from the SEC to
do this until after the blog in question.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

OK, I checked. - Authored by: PJ on Tuesday, May 01 2012 @ 04:47 PM EDT
- Not all things in the annual report had to happen the first day of the fiscal year. - Authored by: s65_sean on Tuesday, May 01 2012 @ 05:02 PM EDT
  - Not all things in the annual report had to happen the first day of the fiscal year. - Authored by: PJ on Tuesday, May 01 2012 @ 05:09 PM EDT
    - So What Happens Next? - Authored by: mexaly on Tuesday, May 01 2012 @ 05:17 PM EDT
    - Not all things in the annual report had to happen the first day of the fiscal year. - Authored by: s65_sean on Tuesday, May 01 2012 @ 05:18 PM EDT
      - Not all things in the annual report had to happen the first day of the fiscal year. - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 01 2012 @ 05:29 PM EDT
      - Material company information - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 01 2012 @ 05:32 PM EDT
        Material company information - Authored by: s65_sean on Tuesday, May 01 2012 @ 06:05 PM EDT
        Don't forget that the filing places the blog as investor info - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 01 2012 @ 06:18 PM EDT
        Material company information - Authored by: PJ on Tuesday, May 01 2012 @ 06:39 PM EDT
        Material company information - Authored by: PJ on Tuesday, May 01 2012 @ 06:42 PM EDT
        Material company information - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 01 2012 @ 07:17 PM EDT
        Material company information - Authored by: jonathon on Wednesday, May 02 2012 @ 12:03 AM EDT
      - Not all things in the annual report had to happen the first day of the fiscal year. - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 01 2012 @ 06:07 PM EDT
      - Not all things in the annual report had to happen the first day of the fiscal year. - Authored by: AntiFUD on Tuesday, May 01 2012 @ 06:16 PM EDT
      - Not all things in the annual report had to happen the first day of the fiscal year. - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 01 2012 @ 06:26 PM EDT
- OK, I checked. - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 02 2012 @ 03:11 AM EDT
Permission from the SEC - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 01 2012 @ 05:54 PM EDT
- Not quite - Authored by: s65_sean on Tuesday, May 01 2012 @ 06:12 PM EDT
- Well that settles it. Official n/t - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 01 2012 @ 06:23 PM EDT
- Permission from the SEC - Authored by: jonathon on Wednesday, May 02 2012 @ 12:08 AM EDT

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )