decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
registerd --> registered | 275 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
The Corrections Thread
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, April 30 2012 @ 05:54 PM EDT
At the end of his closing remarks, Robert Van Nest is quoted as saying:

"Ask a final favor: after I am done, I will sit down, and Oracle will talk
again. What would Oracle say?"

Shouldn't that be "What would Google say?" He is saying that he will
not be able to speak again to respond to Oracle. Isn't he asking the jury for
the favor of thinking what Google would say if they could respond?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

s/Schwartx/Schwartz
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, April 30 2012 @ 05:57 PM EDT
(unless the counsel really did say that ;-)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

s/transforation/transformation/ (n/t)
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, April 30 2012 @ 06:30 PM EDT
s/transforation/transformation/

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

s/Google: SSO is more that de minimis/Oracle: SSO is more than de minimis/
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, April 30 2012 @ 06:33 PM EDT
Google: SSO is more that de minimis. [Really? I think that's Oracle, just like
Sun buying Oracle a few days ago...]

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

s/documentatin/documentation/
Authored by: qubit on Tuesday, May 01 2012 @ 11:24 AM EDT
in "Conclude that Google's use of the documentatin was not fair use"

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

s/fromm/from/
Authored by: qubit on Tuesday, May 01 2012 @ 11:39 AM EDT
in "Similarity comes fromm"

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

cousel --> counsel
Authored by: ankylosaurus on Tuesday, May 01 2012 @ 02:56 PM EDT
Just before Oracle's closing begins, at:

Judge: Nothing that is said by cousel is evidence,



---
The Dinosaur with a Club at the End of its Tail

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

th --> the; also THe --> The
Authored by: ankylosaurus on Tuesday, May 01 2012 @ 03:01 PM EDT
When the judge is instructing the jury:

It is your duty to find th facts,

I know - trivia.


---
The Dinosaur with a Club at the End of its Tail

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

negotiottions --> negotiations
Authored by: ankylosaurus on Tuesday, May 01 2012 @ 04:36 PM EDT
In Oracle's closing:

there were negotiottions between

---
The Dinosaur with a Club at the End of its Tail

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

registerd --> registered
Authored by: ankylosaurus on Tuesday, May 01 2012 @ 04:39 PM EDT
In Oracle's closing:

Sun registerd copyrights for version

---
The Dinosaur with a Club at the End of its Tail

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

The Corrections Thread update #3
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 01 2012 @ 04:57 PM EDT
Oracle says nine Android files in the range-check function
had code identical to that of Java

Should read

Oracle says nine Android lines of code in the range-check
function had code identical to that of Java

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )