decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
I feel betrayed | 275 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
I feel betrayed
Authored by: PJ on Tuesday, May 01 2012 @ 08:14 AM EDT
Several things. First, Linux is GPLv2 only.
Second, GPLv3 prohibits any new Novell-type
agreements, so MS can't do that again.
Third, my point was that when the Open Source
folks decided to downplay the F in FOSS
and try to get corporations to adopt Open
Source software, they thought they were
doing a great thing when IBM and others
did.

But now some time has elapsed, and while IBM
was a good example, more or less, others have
been more rapacious. The love affair between
corporations and the Apache License is a clear
sign, to me, that they just want to take and
give back nothing, so they can continue to
lock in customers with their proprietary add ons,
like Apple, only worse.

So now, with the advantage of hindsight, what
can we conclude? Was it a good idea to drop the
F in FOSS and focus only on the O?

I say no. It took a while to play out, but
in the end it got us nowhere that matters. With
patents, open source means no protection at all,
while meanwhile these large corporate players
got the community to code for them for free.
That's what they think the F stands for, free
labor. It doesn't. It stands for freedom, 4
of them for users, and freedom for the code.

So by being "nice", and not thinking ahead
as clearly as Stallman did, bad things are
happening, and you can't even say the corporate
players are doing anything "wrong", in that
they were told they could do it by the
licenses.

So, I'm glad that the latest studies show that
while businesses are opting for the Apache
License, the community continues to choose the
GPL overwhelmingly.

THe Oracle API junk, to me, is with the express
goal of making it harder or impossible for
FOSS to be developed and to shut down what
already exists (or alternatively to make a bundle
by taxing it every which way). That's what SCO
wanted too. So the problem turns out to be
much bigger than SCO. It's proprietary trying
to kill the competition or strip mine it.

Barnes & Noble used Android because it was free.
They leveraged that to make a deal with Microsoft
for millions, which the execs will get rewarded
for personally, I would guess, but to me it's
like a condemned man's fabulous last meal. It
doesn't last or solve his real problem.

But that's their problem. The community's problem
is to try, now that we see what's happening,to
come up with a solution so FOSS can survive.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )