decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Srsly? | 158 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Srsly?
Authored by: jonathon on Monday, April 30 2012 @ 01:52 PM EDT
This isn't the first time that it has been proposed that patents remain secret.

However, the rational here is as pathetic as the one used to justify stamping
patents "top secret" and/or "eyes only".

My guess is that a patent troll just saw that its protfolio was about to drop by
several billion dollars, and to preserve their criminal enterprise, is handing
out bribes to those willing to preserve their extortion and racketeering
business.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

who cares?
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, April 30 2012 @ 02:53 PM EDT
It's already too dangerous for developers to ever look at patents, it can triple
their liability if they are ever eventually found to infringe. It's not worth
the meager benefits that revealing the tech behind the patent is supposed to
provide. Some of my former employers advised me to never look at U.S. patents
because it wasn't worth the risk.

If this becomes law, it will just drive more innovation out of the U.S. and into
countries where actual R&D is not as dangerous (i.e. less chance of being
patent-trolled out of existence).

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )