decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
So, no patents then. | 158 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Srsly?
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, April 30 2012 @ 01:24 PM EDT
Secret patents? Srsly?

Secret copyrights next on the list, then secret trademarks?

People will be sued for using words which they could not have known were
protected. Same goes for inventions.

Obviously there must be more to this, but gut feeling is this is a bad idea.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

  • Srsly? - Authored by: jonathon on Monday, April 30 2012 @ 01:52 PM EDT
  • who cares? - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, April 30 2012 @ 02:53 PM EDT
The only fair way to do this would be to bar enforcement.
Authored by: mtew on Monday, April 30 2012 @ 01:37 PM EDT
After all, if the patent is secret, there is no way you can know that it exists
so there is no way to avoid infringing it.

In other words, SECRET PATENTS ARE A TOTALLY STUPID (if not completely insane)
IDEA. Whoever suggested this should be locked up in order to protect the
public. (Actions that would lead to a non-terminal Darwin award might also be a
good idea; it's that bad an idea.)

---
MTEW

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Well yes and no.
Authored by: celtic_hackr on Monday, April 30 2012 @ 02:23 PM EDT
The PDF says this includes a new category to keep certain economic patents
secret until they issue. It also talks about NS issues, which those patents are
already secret, and remain so.

It's a crazy idea. The applicant can ask to not publish it until it's approved.
So no foreign companies can design a work around for it and/or contest it's
eligibility.

So the idea behind this is to torpedo foreign companies with patent infringement
claims years later, after they've already developed a product, which happens to
infringe, and not give them a chance to come up with a non-infringing product.
So foreign companies who created a market for an invention that the American
inventor never got around to making shall pay the penalty for infringing a
patent they couldn't possibly known they be infringing.

Riiiiiiight.

Sounds like a patent troll works in Congress, or has their ear. I call it like I
see it.

1) Publish a paper on some new way of doing wifi.
2) Secretly apply for a patent in the US.
3) Wait for someone to produce products based on my paper, and patent to issue.
4) Sue, sue, sue!
5) Profit!

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Secret Patents have existed for decades
Authored by: SpaceLifeForm on Monday, April 30 2012 @ 03:51 PM EDT
Link

There are over 5000 secret patents in the US.

In fact, Microsoft has some.

---

You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Classified patents
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, April 30 2012 @ 05:05 PM EDT
Classified inventions can be patented by those who have a security clearance.
The patent's term of exclusivity starts when it's eventually declassified.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

So, no patents then.
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 02 2012 @ 09:46 AM EDT
I understand that Patents exist only to give the creators a
"temporary" monopoly on their creations in return for
"sharing" the details of their invention. If the sharing part of the
contract is eliminated, there is no contract since there is no value exchanged
for the monopoly advantage. This means it's no longer a Patent, its a monopoly.
:(

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )