|
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, April 28 2012 @ 02:22 AM EDT |
<blockquote>I couldn't understand why none of the geeks testifying didn't
use this model.</blockquote>
Because if you want someone to <b>really</b> understand something,
you lead them to the point where they make the final discovery and statement of
the idea themselves.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: jonathon on Saturday, April 28 2012 @ 10:18 AM EDT |
In a criminal trial, as a general rule of thumb, you do not want a jury to hear
the case, if you are truly innocent.
(There are a couple of exceptions, such as the Tennessee judge that routinely
convicts non-Baptists, on the grounds that they are sinners, as such belong in
jail, and then in hell, even when the facts are that the defendent is more
honest, law abiding, and adheres to the mitzvot more rigidly than the pastor of
the Baptist church that the judge attends.)
Civil trials are a little more complicated, but usually you don't want a jury
trial, because juries vote based on emotion, not facts.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|