decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Read Google's rule-50 motion on this | 687 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
It is all auto-generated from source code and comments
Authored by: bugstomper on Friday, April 27 2012 @ 01:28 PM EDT
The Java API Specification is the output of the javadoc program run over the source code. The source code is supposed to contain comments written in a certain template format that contains everything that goes into the API Specification document. You can see the result at

JavaTM 2 Platform Standard Edition 5.0 API Specification

Everything in there is generated from the package, class, field, and method declarations in the source files, and the embedded comments that start with /** and have other markers in them that label the documentation components that javadoc pulls out and organizes.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Read Google's rule-50 motion on this
Authored by: jbb on Friday, April 27 2012 @ 03:03 PM EDT
1. The evidence cannot support a finding that Android’s English-language documentation was copied from the Java API specifications.

Oracle adduced evidence of precisely three examples of alleged substantial similarity between Google’s and Oracle’s specifications for the 37 APIs. A “mere scintilla” of evidence is insufficient to support a jury verdict. See Lakeside-Scott v. Multnomah County, 556 F. 3d 797, 802 (9th Cir. 2005) (quoting Willis v. Marion County Auditor’s Office, 118 F.3d 542, 545 (7th Cir. 1997)). Oracle’s three examples — out of over 11,000 pages of specifications (RT 617:2-7 (Reinhold))[6] — cannot support a jury verdict.

[...] The only evidence in the record relates to these classes; Oracle did not present evidence on any other classes. Oracle could have, but didn’t, present evidence of an automated comparison between the Android and Java documentation as a whole, as it did with the implementing source code. This absence is telling. It is also grounds to dismiss Oracle’s claim that Android’s documentation for anything but the CipherInputStream, Cipher, and Pipe classes infringe Oracle’s specifications for those same classes.



[6] The 11,000 page figure is the length of the specifications for just the 37 API packages. The specifications for all 166 API packages of the J2SE 5.0 platform presumably are several-fold longer, and the size of the J2SE 5.0 platform as a whole is larger still.
The judge told one of the parties that they were going to lose on "that big fat manual". After reading Google's motion, I think the judge was saying that to Oracle. Google's entire motion can be found in the Groklaw article here.

---
Our job is to remind ourselves that there are more contexts than the one we’re in now — the one that we think is reality.
-- Alan Kay

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )