decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
None of it matters | 687 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Not necessarily Oracle's fault
Authored by: greed on Friday, April 27 2012 @ 09:36 PM EDT
Oracle should have vetted the copyright registrations before beginning this
action.

Copyright registration, as I've learned, is a prerequisite in the U.S. to
launching legal action. Copyright adheres at creation (post Berne), but you
still have to file it before you sue.

It's like checking you've got beers in the 'fridge before your friends come over
to watch the fights. Or checking that the potatoes haven't grown into a
multi-eyed monster before planning to make French fries.

But if they only did "2-3 days" due diligence on buying Sun, it serves
them right! Between inspections, legal review, financing, insurance and the
rest, I spent more time than that just buying a house.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Not necessarily Oracle's fault
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, April 27 2012 @ 11:06 PM EDT
Yes of course Oracle are "entitled to rely on the Copyright Office
saying 'yes, we received the disks and someone logged that they
checked and saw the data?'"

But we haven't seen the documents, and from hearsay accounts
of attorneys' conversations with the judge, it seems that possibly
the Copyright Office did not check and see the data. As "greed"
says in different words, Oracle is looking more like SCO every day.
They didn't know what it was they'd bought the copyrights to,
or even if there was anything to copyright.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

No. The Copyright Office did not "wipe the disk"
Authored by: Ed L. on Friday, April 27 2012 @ 11:58 PM EDT
From the US Copyright Office' FAQ:
Can I submit my manuscript on a computer disk? No. Floppy disks and other removal media such as Zip disks, except for CD-ROMs, are not acceptable.
My bold. While not perfect, CDROMs are an awfully good bet for long-term preservation. (Keep multiple copies, regenerate every five years, etc.) One CDROM might be damaged, but at least the Copyright Office will know it was there, and that *something* had been on it.

I'm not all suggesting that Oracle does not have legitimate Berne Convention copyrights in most parts of Java. But they should properly register those parts before trial, and be prepared to specifically identify them in court. Otherwise, what's the point?

---
Real Programmers mangle their own memory.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Not necessarily Oracle's fault
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, April 28 2012 @ 12:02 AM EDT
What kind of disk is this? Is it a CD DVD disk? How do you wipe data off a cd?
You can destroy the data but can you wipe it as in make the disk blank as like a
new unused disk if it is fixated? The copyright office said it was blank. Did
they mean they could read nothing? Did they look at the recorded side to see if
it was different looking to the eyes than a new blank cd.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

None of it matters
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, April 28 2012 @ 10:54 AM EDT
Registration of copyright, strengthens your copyright protection, and agrees
that you have something that is or has parts that are protectable.

It does not assert what is protected

Software copyright registration is a trivial process
50 pages of redacted source code (first and last 25)
50 pages of hexadecimal dump of the binary object code (first and last 25)
Manuals, Specifications and other associated documentation.

For comparison identify the each of the "works" and proceed with
abstraction and filtration as necessary.


Oracle has copyright in something, it doesn't matter whether it was registered
correctly, they must identify what it is for each of the works, parts of, or SSO
of they accuse of infringing.

And they have to prove it is theirs.


neither of which is very comforting

Do Google even need the last bit?
Or are they just being mean?

or something like that

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )