decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
No such thing as a collection! | 687 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Is there a difference between a compilation and a collection?
Authored by: Ian Al on Saturday, April 28 2012 @ 10:03 AM EDT
Yes, under copyright law there is and you all hid it from me. I hate you all!

I guess (literally) that a compilation is a synonym for anthology as in 'poetry
anthology'. The organisation and selection of the poems is protected.

A collection is as in 'art collection'. The order is not important, just the
selection. That is interesting because it suggests that a registration of a Java
collection would not protect the organisation of the API library packages
enumerated in the registration.

---
Regards
Ian Al
Software Patents: It's the disclosed functions in the patent, stupid!

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

No such thing as a collection!
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, April 28 2012 @ 04:28 PM EDT
No! :)

There is no such thing as a "collection" as an independent concept in copyright law: there are only "compilations" and "collective works" (which are a kind of compilation).

Here are the definitions from USC. Ch 17:

A "compilation" is a work formed by the collection and assembling of preexisting materials or of data that are selected, coordinated, or arranged in such a way that the resulting work as a whole constitutes an original work of authorship. The term "compilation" includes collective works.

A "collective work" is a work, such as a periodical issue, anthology, or encyclopedia, in which a number of contributions, constituting separate and independent works in themselves, are assembled into a collective whole.

Now that that's been settled, maybe we can convince Mr. Ian Al (whose ideas about copyright law just seem to get more and more strange as this case goes on) that there is no such thing as an (or multiple) SSO(s) in a work - there is only the SSO of the work, and it's always structure, sequence, and organization (all technically synonymous for copyright purposes) if it's a (singular) computer program. Also, the selection, coordination, and arrangement is protected in a compilation if it is original.

Sorry to pick on you Mr. Al - you were simply a handy example. ;)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )