|
| Authored by: ewilts on Friday, April 27 2012 @ 01:07 PM EDT |
| s/contexgt/context [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: jbb on Friday, April 27 2012 @ 01:19 PM EDT |
| Who will probably lose on the manuals? The way I read the sentence you are
saying Google will probably lose on the manuals (pronouns always connecting with
the first valid match going backward in the sentence). I realize this rule is
not always followed so strictly.
There was a lot of confusion about this
yesterday so I think it would be good to be extra clear on this point. After I
read Google's rule-50 motion, I think the judge was saying Oracle was going to
lose on the manuals. I gave my reasons here which is mostly a quote from Google's
motion. Before I had read that, I thought the judge was implying Google was
going to lose on the manuals.
---
Our job is to remind ourselves that
there are more contexts than the one we’re in now — the one that we think is
reality.
-- Alan Kay [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, April 27 2012 @ 03:15 PM EDT |
In the section "Rebuttal testimony of Dr. Mark Reinhold" it is still
using Owen Astrachan as the witness instead of Mark Reinhold[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: bugstomper on Friday, April 27 2012 @ 03:15 PM EDT |
Every statement by Reinhold in the first section of his testimony is labeled
Astrachan instead of Reinhold.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, April 27 2012 @ 03:17 PM EDT |
In the "Rebuttal testimony of Dr. Mark Reinhold" part of
the report, "Owen Astrachan" should read "Dr. Reinhold".[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Tkilgore on Friday, April 27 2012 @ 03:18 PM EDT |
[Oracle calls Dr. Reinhold.]
Rebuttal testimony of Dr. Mark Reinhold
Oracle: How long did it take to design the java.nio JSR API.
Owen Astrachan: About 2 years.
Oracle: How long would it take to design a max API?
Owen Astrachan: About 30 seconds.
(continues to refer to Astrachan)
---------------------------------------------
So, the question. In this section, is it supposed to be Reinhold throughout and
not Astrachan? I am confused.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, April 27 2012 @ 03:31 PM EDT |
From "Rebuttal testimony of Dr. Mark Reinhold"
To "Oracle calls Tiki Dare"[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: red floyd on Friday, April 27 2012 @ 04:52 PM EDT |
| There should be a line break between the question mark and Owen
Astrachan:
... and source code? Owen Astrachan:
Yes.
Should be:
... and source code? Owen
Astrachan: Yes.
---
I am not merely a "consumer" or a
"taxpayer". I am a *CITIZEN* of the United States of America.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: bugstomper on Friday, April 27 2012 @ 05:55 PM EDT |
Missing newline in first line of this excerpt, and see the Dro. John Mitchell
that should be Safra Katz.
-------
Google: And this is after Oracle thought about but did not pursue a Java phone?
Safra Katz: Yeah, hard to compete with free.
Google: And then you went to Google and started to demand licensing?
Safra Katz: Correct.
Google: Exhibit 1074 - that was the response from Google?
Dr. John Mitchell: Yes, that's what he wrote in the email.
Google: Your compensation is 10's of millions of dollars?
Safra Katz: I'm the American dream.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, April 27 2012 @ 06:36 PM EDT |
Feb 2001: HP's Java clone
heads to gadgets
Aug 1999: Head of HP's
Embedded Java VM Project Speaks
Out
March 1998: Hewlett-Pack
ards homebrew Java
"Hewlett-Packard announced that it has
developed, licensed,
and shipped its own version of Java for so-called
"constrained environments" such as printers, and that
Microsoft is its first
licensee"[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: julian on Friday, April 27 2012 @ 07:18 PM EDT |
In 3rd update.
Judge: Non-starter queestion.
---
John Julian[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: kh on Friday, April 27 2012 @ 07:23 PM EDT |
| . [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, April 27 2012 @ 07:24 PM EDT |
| Also Rebutall -> Rebutal [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: jjon on Saturday, April 28 2012 @ 11:04 AM EDT |
To be valid Java, you need to make these changes:
- Main ->
main
- string-> String
- inputstream-> InputStream
- OpenStream->
openStream
- system-> System
Which gives:
// @author:
aulut [or whatever his username is]
public class WebReader {
public static void main(String [] arg) {
java.net.URL site =
new
java.net.URL("http://cnn.com/");
java.io.InputStream
source =
site.openStream();
System.out.print(source.read());
}
}
References:
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, April 28 2012 @ 02:51 PM EDT |
| ..in ReCross of Dr. Reinhold by Google [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, April 29 2012 @ 10:39 AM EDT |
| Safra Katz: We never wanted to be in this litigatoin. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: jmcg on Sunday, April 29 2012 @ 10:47 AM EDT |
"Well, OK. But he's paid by Oracle."
Who is 'he' in this context? The only person mentioned in the vicinity of this
comment is the 'court'. I'm sure that PJ didn't mean to imply that the court is
on the payroll of Oracle but due to ambiguity, that's the way it reads.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
