|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, April 27 2012 @ 06:02 PM EDT |
Before I read Google's motion I thought the
judge
meant Google was
going to lose on the big fat manual because
I assumed "big fat" alluded to how
much evidence Oracle had
showing substantial similarities in the
manuals.
I had always assumed "big fat" was meant literally, a
consequence of being old enough to remember when programmers
worked from
printed manuals instead of hypertext. The VAX
VMS manuals were sometimes
referred to as
"the gray wall" due to the large number of binders they
filled.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, April 27 2012 @ 06:10 PM EDT |
It is not actually in dispute, if you read the proposed special verdict.
What is in dispute is the SSO the 'book'
You can see it for yourself
go to developer.android.com click on the reference tab
now click on the button for the tree view, and when you open the java sections
you will see the SSO
yes it might be trivial, yes it might be nonsense, yes it might be names, but
it's there, just like the second number in the zip code etc.
I think the para you quote is just a part of stating all the points of
defence/attack to cover all the bases.
The rest I've been saying all along.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
