decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
But is the correct answer to litigate open and free into closed and expensive? ...nt | 687 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Safra Catz: It's pretty hard to compete with free.
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, April 27 2012 @ 08:32 PM EDT
I've never found it difficult to compete with something that is free.

What I do, is provide a service instead: updates and desired enhancements to
software for example.

I understand both IBM and Red Hat make gobs of money, basically applying the
same strategy.

The hard part is avoiding the nasty people who use legal trickery, political
bribery, and highly paid lawyers to twist the legal system, so that they can
extort money from other peoples work.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Safra Catz: It's pretty hard to compete with free.
Authored by: jjs on Saturday, April 28 2012 @ 08:16 AM EDT
Tell that to the bottled water companies, who literally sell
at high price what you can get for free (some is even bottled
tap water).

---
(Note IANAL, I don't play one on TV, etc, consult a practicing attorney, etc,
etc)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

But is the correct answer to litigate open and free into closed and expensive? ...nt
Authored by: Ian Al on Saturday, April 28 2012 @ 10:40 AM EDT
.

---
Regards
Ian Al
Software Patents: It's the disclosed functions in the patent, stupid!

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Safra Catz: It's pretty hard to compete with free.
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, April 29 2012 @ 05:58 AM EDT
Which is probably why Oracle bought MySQL so that they could cause it to wither
away.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )